Leagues United New Format - Individual Rankings

Discussion for Leagues United players
User avatar
Moto Unit
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 2:15 pm
Location: Manistee, Michigan

Re: Leagues United New Format - Individual Rankings

Post by Moto Unit » Sun May 28, 2017 10:21 pm

I love you millennials...always looking for a participation trophy. Not only must you get elo points for wins but you see it as fitting to rub it in the losers face by gaining more advantage based on how many scores you get by capping? Really? Great sportsmanship and really mature I might add. I hope you "strong" players get your way....I really do...and then when no one comes to play on your servers anymore because you big strong awesome players rule the universe you can play by yourselves.

click click boom
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: Leagues United New Format - Individual Rankings

Post by click click boom » Mon May 29, 2017 10:38 pm

moto? can you elaborate?

click click boom
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: Leagues United New Format - Individual Rankings

Post by click click boom » Tue May 30, 2017 5:18 am

Moto: just to he clear there won't be more points awarded for more captures atleast i don't think so. I don't think many if any strong player wants it like that.

But we should reward close matches even for the loser so.. something like if

Myself and runruns match vs blinks and miro who are ranked higher than us and if we lose by 1 capture we are awarded somehow by that.. if they beat us by 2 captures we are not.. to avoid teams from racking up the score you just cap it at a lower number to prevent that.. so it's not more the captures more the points... but a way to encourage weaker teams to offi better teams could be achieved this way 👍🏻

Bad company wins vs toma hawk 3-0 we lost -10
If bad company wins can toma hawk 2-1 we lose -5

User avatar
llrr
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:00 am
Location: aus

Re: Leagues United New Format - Individual Rankings

Post by llrr » Wed May 31, 2017 5:22 am

Moto Unit wrote:
Sun May 28, 2017 10:21 pm
I love you millennials...always looking for a participation trophy. Not only must you get elo points for wins but you see it as fitting to rub it in the losers face by gaining more advantage based on how many scores you get by capping? Really? Great sportsmanship and really mature I might add. I hope you "strong" players get your way....I really do...and then when no one comes to play on your servers anymore because you big strong awesome players rule the universe you can play by yourselves.
Moto, this was a discussion about the idea. It doesn't mean it was going to be implemented, it depended upon player feedback.

Also, you have to view this from more than just one perspective. Not all matches are extremely uneven, to the point where the winning team is winning by 10-0. The idea behind it was that the losing team wouldn't lose extra points, but the winning team is rewarded for a certain number of winnings caps, up to a threshold, which I suggested to be +5 (btw, plenty of matches have been won by much more than 5 caps so I thought this was more than reasonable).

In any case, we have since discarded this idea because there is not enough support for it. So it will remain as present, where only win/loss matters and not the number of caps.
llrr

hj
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: USA

Re: Leagues United New Format - Individual Rankings

Post by hj » Tue Jun 06, 2017 1:58 am

Moto Unit wrote: I love you millennials...always looking for a participation trophy. Not only must you get elo points for wins but you see it as fitting to rub it in the losers face by gaining more advantage based on how many scores you get by capping?
For the record, this would be the exact opposite of a participation trophy.

However, I agree that the idea might incentivize blowouts. But, keep in mind, if all we do is look at win vs. loss for the losing side, then that disincentivizes good players from evening up a lopsided FM.
-hj

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest