So a 0-2 killing a 2-0 results in 1-2 and 2-1 instead of 1-0 and 0-1 respectively?optic delusion wrote: ↑Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:39 amIf either player does not have three wins or three losses at the time of the kill, it just ignores the points, and you each gain or lose the one point as you normally would without the flag.
Apocalypse In Action :: Planet MoFo
-
tainn
- Private First Class
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:25 pm
- Location: zone of the phantoms
Re: New Flag! Point Siphon
-
optic delusion
- Special Forces
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:29 pm
- Location: Planet MoFo
- Contact:
Re: Apocalypse In Action :: Planet MoFo
If either player does not have the three necessary wins (kills) or losses (deaths) to add or remove, nothing happens.
It's a +1 and a -1, the same as a no-flag kill.
At next restart we will lose the triple-point flag. Which I always called TP, toilet paper.
It's a +1 and a -1, the same as a no-flag kill.
At next restart we will lose the triple-point flag. Which I always called TP, toilet paper.
Take a look at my Defender game mode concept.
Thinking is not an automatic process. A man can choose to think or to let his mind stagnate, or he can choose actively to turn against his intelligence, to evade his knowledge, to subvert his reason. If he refuses to think, he courts disaster: he cannot with impunity reject his means of perceiving reality.
Thinking is not an automatic process. A man can choose to think or to let his mind stagnate, or he can choose actively to turn against his intelligence, to evade his knowledge, to subvert his reason. If he refuses to think, he courts disaster: he cannot with impunity reject his means of perceiving reality.
-
optic delusion
- Special Forces
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:29 pm
- Location: Planet MoFo
- Contact:
Win Siphon
CORRECTION:
The name is Win Siphon {WS} ... I've been calling it by the wrong name.
The name is Win Siphon {WS} ... I've been calling it by the wrong name.
Take a look at my Defender game mode concept.
Thinking is not an automatic process. A man can choose to think or to let his mind stagnate, or he can choose actively to turn against his intelligence, to evade his knowledge, to subvert his reason. If he refuses to think, he courts disaster: he cannot with impunity reject his means of perceiving reality.
Thinking is not an automatic process. A man can choose to think or to let his mind stagnate, or he can choose actively to turn against his intelligence, to evade his knowledge, to subvert his reason. If he refuses to think, he courts disaster: he cannot with impunity reject his means of perceiving reality.
Re: Apocalypse In Action :: Planet MoFo
An appeal to remove the 20/20 flag.
Isnʻt this a Capture The Flag server? Itʻs hard to CTF if youʻre stuck with a flag for 20 seconds. A couple of times Iʻve been near the other teamʻs flag and accidentally picked up the 20 flag, and had to run round while looking for the antidote flag (which lately has spawned across the map), while waiting for the timer to expire.
Aggravating at best.
Isnʻt this a Capture The Flag server? Itʻs hard to CTF if youʻre stuck with a flag for 20 seconds. A couple of times Iʻve been near the other teamʻs flag and accidentally picked up the 20 flag, and had to run round while looking for the antidote flag (which lately has spawned across the map), while waiting for the timer to expire.
Aggravating at best.
-
optic delusion
- Special Forces
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 2:29 pm
- Location: Planet MoFo
- Contact:
Twenty Twenty
I want to have one "bad" flag. This is the least offensive thing I could think of. It's only ONE flag. You can still shoot and move normally.
Maybe I should put a bouncy flag instead?
Maybe I should put a bouncy flag instead?
Take a look at my Defender game mode concept.
Thinking is not an automatic process. A man can choose to think or to let his mind stagnate, or he can choose actively to turn against his intelligence, to evade his knowledge, to subvert his reason. If he refuses to think, he courts disaster: he cannot with impunity reject his means of perceiving reality.
Thinking is not an automatic process. A man can choose to think or to let his mind stagnate, or he can choose actively to turn against his intelligence, to evade his knowledge, to subvert his reason. If he refuses to think, he courts disaster: he cannot with impunity reject his means of perceiving reality.