BZEthics: Observers

Talk between players of the game about the game ( no personal attacks )
Post Reply
User avatar
jftsang
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:32 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

BZEthics: Observers

Post by jftsang »

Sometimes a teammate joins the Observer team (or even the enemies) and then feeds details to us such as "ST base" or such, or even shoot their teammates to help us. Is this ethical behaviour?
slon02
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 9:27 pm

Post by slon02 »

Definitely not.
Current Server: hosting.BZADDICT.net:5173
Former Server: Fairserve.bzflag.org:5259
User avatar
jftsang
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:32 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by jftsang »

well, the TKing goes without saying

However, I notice that many server admins don't put that in their rules:

They often include cheating, swearing, TKing, spamming, but they don't seem to notice this... and yet it is common.
F687/s
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 369
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:30 pm

Post by F687/s »

> Sometimes a teammate joins the Observer team (or even the enemies) and then feeds details to us such
> as "ST base"...


It depends. On places such as the GU League, where you actually have permanent teammates, this is a very good strategy. Such a "coach" can make or break the team, by viewing things that other may miss. But TKing is always bad.

Just my thoughts.
User avatar
Triumph of the Soul
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:32 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Triumph of the Soul »

F687/s wrote:> Sometimes a teammate joins the Observer team (or even the enemies) and then feeds details to us such
> as "ST base"...


It depends. On places such as the GU League, where you actually have permanent teammates, this is a very good strategy. Such a "coach" can make or break the team, by viewing things that other may miss. But TKing is always bad.

Just my thoughts.
Just because you can give one team an unfair advantage, doesn't mean you should. I don't believe there is a such thing as a "permanent team mate", but if there is, they shouldn't express their affinity during a match they don't directly participate in. You can't always count on the other team having similar "permanent team mates", or even an equal number of them.

And one question F687/s:

> Why do you quote like this...
>
When you could press a button and quote like this?
Just something that's been on my mind.
Image
Creator @: Duck or Die, Duck or Die CTF, Fuel Stack, Guernica, Normal, Frayed
User avatar
Joe-Schmoe
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:10 am
Location: This field unintentionally left blank.

Post by Joe-Schmoe »

If the teams are full, I can easily see Observers feeding hints being ok. The advantage given by such an observer is probably minimal, and the observer can have fun by contributing to the battle.

Sometimes I single out a player to follow and give advice. However, when I do this I usually set the observer mode to "following", so that I don't have any information the player doesn't have.

There is a related problem: people join the observer team to force the hand of the FairCTF plugin, preventing a legitimate capture.
Join MI6!
F687/s
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 369
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:30 pm

Post by F687/s »

A Distraction wrote:Just because you can give one team an unfair advantage, doesn't mean you should. I don't believe there is a such thing as a "permanent team mate", but if there is, they shouldn't express their affinity during a match they don't directly participate in. You can't always count on the other team having similar "permanent team mates", or even an equal number of them.
By "permanent team mate," I was kind of speaking of league team mates. But if you're just going to be an observer on Missile Wars (or something similar), I don't think that holds nearly as much importance. Maybe if you give out hints to both teams, but that's not really that much fun to either team. Observers are made to observe
A Distraction wrote: And one question F687/s:

> Why do you quote like this...
>
When you could press a button and quote like this?
Just something that's been on my mind.
Mainly because I also frequent a few boards that do not allow direct quoting (mostly homebrew forums software). I do use the built-in quoting if I need to quote large pieces of text, but it takes a lot less time (for me) to quote things using the first way, especially if I want to quote multiple people.
think_tank
Private
Private
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:09 am

Post by think_tank »

This happened today on MW as well. The admin kicked him and I fully approve.
Tank 52
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:08 am
Location: Glen Cove,NY

Post by Tank 52 »

Yes its pretty common, today, someone used geno on his own team and then switched sides, that is really unfair, but observing and giving hints is fair if the teams are full, seems okay.Some servers should have rules on this sort of thing if they want, and me personally, think they should.
just saying
User avatar
Saber
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:27 pm
Location: ¨¨¨¨¨

Post by Saber »

It kills the fun when I'm sneaky with ST and some observer says "Watch out, there's an ST right there".
The S
Image
User avatar
tw1sted
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 849
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by tw1sted »

IMO, this is not a bad thing. Observers have their name for a reason. They observe. They can choose weather or not to pass along the information they observe to other players.
User avatar
RexFlex
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:13 pm
Location: Australia

Post by RexFlex »

I consider it unethical to pass information on as an observer that the player could not otherwise know.

Offering strategic advice isn't a problem because it allows the recipient to become a better player over time and it is something a better player may already know as the recipient.

But alerting of a stealth position because the observer can utilise how the observation process works is the equivalent of using a cheat client to see the tanks that are supposed to be stealthed on their radar. If I caught an observer doing this then I would not hesitate to sanction a removal of the observer from the server.
"Hell, I'll kill a man in a fair fight, or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight, or if he bothers me, or if there's a woman, or if I'm gettin paid; mostly only when I'm gettin paid. But eating people alive, when does that get fun?"
User avatar
joevano
General
General
Posts: 1863
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: South Bend, Indiana, USA

Post by joevano »

I have to agree with RexFlex. I have been thinking about this for a while and hadn't come up with a good analogy. RexFlex hit the nail right on the head. IMHO, under ansolutely no circumstances is passing information on to a team, that they (the team) does not have access to through their own client(s) (at that point in time), ethical. A teammate can say ST behind you... but an observer with all seeing powers is quite unfair.

PS. I was the admin mentioned above that kicked an observer for passing on just this type of information
There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." -- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
Ride
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:41 pm

Post by Ride »

I also agree with RexFlex. The observers using roaming in the correct way can see every thing going on in the battle field wheather it be ST or someone about to turn the corner to snipe with laser. It should not be allowed for an observer with massive seeing abilities to call the shots in battle. Helping with strategies is fine but giving away unfair information such as Rex said about the cheat client analogy is exactly that. It is cheating. Because you are swaying the game in someone's (or in some cases some team's) favor. If I'm not mistaken that is what most cheats do...
Post Reply