Graphic tank conversions

Make suggestions for improving one of the best games on the net!
User avatar
hlfmnhlfamazing
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: USA

Graphic tank conversions

Post by hlfmnhlfamazing » Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:18 pm

Just a thought........

A few of the key flags would make the tanks look visually different on screen.

There's already a few which do this now, that being a zoned tank(being somewhat seethrough) and cloak where the tank is gone. Tiny, obese, thief, masquerade and narrow.

The one I had at the top of the list would be the shield flag. If the tank looked beefier/padded on screen(3d), and upon being hit the "scales" or whatever would shatter off.

The wings flag. The tank would actually have wings, and the wings would have a similar look to them as a zoned tank? but the tank itself would look normal.

GM flag, the tank would gain some sort of small radar assembly and square rocket launcher assembly on the top, possibly replacing the turrett.

Machine Gun would give a tank two shorter length barrels.

Maybe even the shockwave flag, the turret would disappear altogether and some sort of coil assembly would be there. Or a coil would be added somewhere. I had something on my mind like what you'd see on command and conquer: red alert.(the tesla coils)

Alot of flags and the tank would still just "look normal". Stealth, high speed, rapid fire, bouncy, genocide, invisible bullet.

There's alot of flags that change the look of your weapon, why not change the look of the tank too?

*EDIT* One of the posters, Goodbye2U has mentioned that the conversions be a graphical add on, as opposed to being a partial conversion.

This is a good idea, I think.
Last edited by hlfmnhlfamazing on Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Spazzy McGee
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Planet MoFo, Sheffield Division; United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by Spazzy McGee » Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:08 pm

This is a fun idea, but it would eliminate the need to identify to see what flag a tank has, which could have some detrimental gameplay effects.
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon

User avatar
Sky King
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:07 pm
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA

Post by Sky King » Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:08 pm

An interesting thought... Would require some client software work, as your client renders your view of other people's tanks, but would not require any server changes.

There is a school of thought that says that the flag you have should be a bit of a secret, but as the poll showed in another thread, a lot of players use the right-click tank identifier anyway.

One of yours that I might change...

MG: A gatling gun, like the nose of an A-10 or the old Army Vulcan

Many tanks could still get a flag makeover:
  • ST: Some kind of coating (like real stealth), a smoother, curvier surface, or a jamming antenna;
  • V (High Speed): Mag Wheels? A big hood scoop with a blower sticking out of it like a dragster? Chrome exhaust?
  • IB: A big silencer-looking thing on the end of the barrel;
  • L: Some sinister looking coil around a glass tube;
  • SB: A larger diamter barrel?
  • Rapid fire... a barrel that looks more like a sub machine gun?
  • Geno: Something that gives the tank a much more sinister look
  • Agility, Quick turn:
I thought about some, like a blindfold for Jamming, Blind, or Colorblind, but bad flag carriers have enough problems the way it is.
Retired Army--Proud to have served
Armored Cavalry Crewman, 1981-1984 (M60A5)
Infantry Officer & Paratrooper, 1984-1986
US Army Ranger & Sniper, 1986-1989 (LRSD)

8-core Intel i7 920, ATI 4850 GPU

User avatar
hlfmnhlfamazing
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: USA

Post by hlfmnhlfamazing » Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:02 pm

Glad to see others like my ideas. Naturally, they can be debated and modified.

Spazzy:

That was my thoughts exactly. Especially taking in consideration a flag like GM. A visual difference would be very detrimental if experienced players happen to be in close proximity.

This could be better in some instances than having a shot limit. For all those turret whores out there. :-)

Sky King:

I do like the idea of machine gun flag changing the look to having a gatling gun.(though I think dual barrels would be pretty sweet. Maybe that could be used for rapid fire or something)

About some of your others, especially the ST flag, you'd want to have alot of flags that still present themselves as normal visually, especially to take into consideration for those who are actually using the ST flag. That's kind of the idea behind not having labels during normal game play. Helps them blend in.

It's pretty clear if you see a tank in the middle of the sky moving around that it's got wings, but it's another thing if you see a close group of 5 and one of those looks completely normal or has the ST visual set that that's a ST.

But of course all of this is for the devs to decide.

User avatar
Skeeve
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:27 pm
Location: Near Aix La Chappel

Post by Skeeve » Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:00 pm

IIRC there was also some discussion about this some time ago in IRC. So why not look into the logs and search for it (I'm to busy (== Lazy)) at the moment.
Avatar created with South Park Studio

Don't you hate it when your posts get deleted without any note?

User avatar
kenshen
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:41 am

Post by kenshen » Fri Nov 17, 2006 12:46 am

but the High Speed flag would put rockets on your tank

User avatar
Ratatosk
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 2:04 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Post by Ratatosk » Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:19 am

has anyone thought of how long it would take to do that? (not saying its a bad idea or anything. :D
Courage is the magic that turns dreams into reality.
Image

User avatar
hlfmnhlfamazing
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: USA

Post by hlfmnhlfamazing » Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:24 am

It should be relatively easy on something like a GM launcher replacement for a turret. Theoretically it's as simple as replacing one graphic call with another. A good portion of the "conversion" work should already done considering current flags that change looks such as tiny, narrow, and so on.

But one such as the wings conversion I suggested, where the tank would have wings, and the wings look like a phantom/phazed tank might require more work.

User avatar
hlfmnhlfamazing
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: USA

Post by hlfmnhlfamazing » Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:53 am

Image
Image

User avatar
whispershadow
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:18 am
Location: I'm a figment of your imagination, where could I be but in your head?

Post by whispershadow » Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:02 am

part of bzflag (to me) that makes it so appealing is the simple graphics. w/ simple graphics, my not-so-decent graphics card can easily handle them. However, if they get 2 complex, as demonstrated by some of loumans verrrry textural maps (churchyard, desktop), my computer, and possibly other peoples, lags awfully.

I REALLY like the idea, i dont know how taxit it would be on the systems tho.

(PS does anyone feel the same way I do, about the graphics I mean?)
I am officially a figment of everyone's imagination.

User avatar
Goodbye2U
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:19 am
Location: In my farewells

Post by Goodbye2U » Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:50 am

How 'bout the option to turn it off, then?

I saw this thread a while ago, I like the idea. :D
I'm thinking I need a better sig than this...

User avatar
bzflaginator
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 275
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 1:50 am
Location: Upstate, New York, USA
Contact:

Post by bzflaginator » Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:00 am

This idea will never happen....well with the current devs. Sorry to burst your bubble. This is due to the fact that bzflag was created to be a simple, open source game. The things you are talking about would require major client changes and taking away from the game's simplicity.
Image
Image
"He that falls in love with himself will have no rivals."
Image
Image

User avatar
the_j0k3r
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:56 am
Location: australia

Post by the_j0k3r » Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:19 pm

this is a copy and paste from jeffm's topic on general board guidelines
1. Don't bump old threads. Basically, if it's off or at the bottom of the front page, or hasn't been posted to in a while (couple weeks) we're already done with it. Make a new topic if you have something to say about the subject. Topics are cheap.
i read through the entire first 3 posts before i realised i had read it before.

sorry, i am not trying to be mean, i hope i dont come across as mean, just some friendly advice
Image

User avatar
JeffM
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 5173
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 4:11 am
Location: https://discord.gg/NN9uAvx
Contact:

Post by JeffM » Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:45 pm

bzflaginator
actually we've been thinking about it.

User avatar
dartman
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 682
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:20 pm
Contact:

Post by dartman » Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:48 pm

bzflaginator wrote:This idea will never happen....well with the current devs. Sorry to burst your bubble. This is due to the fact that bzflag was created to be a simple, open source game. The things you are talking about would require major client changes and taking away from the game's simplicity.
Eh? This wouldn't mess with the game's simplicity that much. The gameplay would still be the same; only the looks would be different.

And I like the idea!

User avatar
khazhyk
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 1400
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 5:40 pm
Location: Somewhere over there.
Contact:

Post by khazhyk » Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:21 pm

exactly, with the visual differences you wouldn't need right click except fro MQ.
Image

meeba
Master Sergeant
Master Sergeant
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:49 pm
Location: N. Sanity Beach
Contact:

Post by meeba » Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:35 pm

Right click is mostly only good for MQ anyways. That and finding campers from a distance (doesn't always work).

User avatar
Davy Jones
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 297
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Davy Jone's Locker

Post by Davy Jones » Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:36 pm

I actually like the idea of these 'changes' But we don't need to completely deface the tank.

Some out there are a little outrageous, and if the devs put something tath everybody hates, chances are they will remove it.
Owner @ The Twin Towers
Admin @ The Two Boxes
Cop @ Army Of One
Image
Image

User avatar
dartman
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 682
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:20 pm
Contact:

Post by dartman » Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:03 am

Maybe for the people who like challenge of having to use right-click, we could have it so the changes are noticable but not too drastic a change from the "normal" tank. It should at least be an option, though that would of course mean making two models for every flagged tank.

User avatar
Goodbye2U
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:19 am
Location: In my farewells

Post by Goodbye2U » Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:36 am

Why not have the graphical changes as model add-ons?
An example:
When someone gets GM,the rocket launcher is added to the tank(NOT the tank model changes)
If he drops the flag, the add-on disappears.
The basic tank model doesn't change, something is just put on top of it.

Anyone like this idea?
I'm thinking I need a better sig than this...

meeba
Master Sergeant
Master Sergeant
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:49 pm
Location: N. Sanity Beach
Contact:

Post by meeba » Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:46 am

Goodbye2U wrote:Why not have the graphical changes as model add-ons?
An example:
When someone gets GM,the rocket launcher is added to the tank(NOT the tank model changes)
If he drops the flag, the add-on disappears.
The basic tank model doesn't change, something is just put on top of it.

Anyone like this idea?
very nice idea, G2U.

User avatar
dartman
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 682
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:20 pm
Contact:

Post by dartman » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:37 am

Yeah that would work well.




Very well. :D

User avatar
Goodbye2U
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:19 am
Location: In my farewells

Post by Goodbye2U » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:19 am

I can try and make some :wink:
I'll use Win XP's tank models to demonstrate.
I apologize if it seems as if I'm taking over the idea.

EDIT: I dunno how to save renders, how do you?
I'm thinking I need a better sig than this...

User avatar
Saber
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:27 pm
Location: ¨¨¨¨¨

Post by Saber » Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:22 am

I like the idea.
JeffM2501 wrote:actually we've been thinking about it.
By thinking about it do you mean:

-What about changing what a tank looks like with a specific flag.
-Why not? / Let's talk about it later

OR

-What about changing what a tank looks like with a specific flag.
-NO WAY!!!

User avatar
hlfmnhlfamazing
Private First Class
Private First Class
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: USA

Post by hlfmnhlfamazing » Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:26 pm

whispershadow wrote:part of bzflag (to me) that makes it so appealing is the simple graphics. w/ simple graphics, my not-so-decent graphics card can easily handle them. However, if they get 2 complex, as demonstrated by some of loumans verrrry textural maps (churchyard, desktop), my computer, and possibly other peoples, lags awfully.

I REALLY like the idea, i dont know how taxit it would be on the systems tho.

(PS does anyone feel the same way I do, about the graphics I mean?)
You bring up a very valid point, however there's nothing that says that it has to be graphical intensive.

Changing the tank to a tiny one isn't a big deal, changing to narrow isn't a big deal, neither is any of the others. Obese and so on.

*EDIT* The models I posted were merey to give an outline of what the tank might look like in the BZflaggish kind of way. I don't expect an actual tank in play to look *LIKE THAT*. :-P

In other words, the bottom half of the BZtank would stay the same just add on the top half.

Just wanted to clear that up.
Last edited by hlfmnhlfamazing on Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply