Mopar Madness wrote:what if the losing team rejects winning sub, winning team forced to cancel match when it was reasonably, but not undoubtedly a victory? The more rules you throw in, the more cracks and holes you throw in as well. And here's a question for you, if this was intended for planned subs, why do people make planned substitutions? To have a better chance of winning. Why would any losing team accept a planned sub then by these rules? Planned subs are few and far between and unless your FF playing match #5000 and trying to get the whole team play time, pretty much the sub will only be to help you win. Maybe this should be the rule: "If you accept to match a team, you accept to match any player combination that team can put on the field unless pre-specified before starting the match."
If a losing team declines the winning team's substitution and declines to postpone, it is no different than the way the situation was before, where the match is simply cancelled. The only difference now is that the losing team is not forced to accept an available substitution that the winning team may have.
Generally I think players just want to finish matches whenever that is possible. In a few distinct cases, some players don't want to match vs. certain others. That is what this new rule attempts to honor. Aside from that, I don't see any significant disruption to the way things happen now.
People talk all the time about how the rules need to be fixed and ask why it is so hard... this is why. Nobody can come to an agreement on what they should be.